Ocean’s Last Frontier: Hidden Dangers of Deep-Sea Mining

The International Seabed Authority (ISA), based in Kingston, Jamaica, has emerged as a significant cause for worry as it exercises control over more than half of the world’s ocean area, with minimal public supervision or media examination.

Founded in 1994, the authority is entrusted with the twin mandate of safeguarding and utilising the Earth’s seas, which raises concerns about potential conflicts of interest in its activities.

One of the main critiques centres on the perceived favouritism of the ISA towards mining corporations. The secretary-general of the ISA Michael Lodge, frequently criticised for his strong connections to the mining industry, further exacerbates concerns over the agency’s neutrality. Detractors contend that this interplay could undermine the ISA’s dedication to protecting the oceans.

Founded in 1994, the ISA is entrusted with the twin mandate of safeguarding and utilising the Earth’s seas, which raises concerns about potential conflicts of interest in its activities.

The ISA is a crucial institution in our global scene, as it addresses the urgent requirement for sustainable management of international seabed resources. The ISA’s regulatory structure ensures responsible exploration of deep-sea mining, as it recognises its role as a caretaker of the shared legacy of humankind.

The function of resource exploitation beyond national borders is addressed by implementing rigorous standards and limiting undesirable environmental repercussions.

Amidst the increasing demand for resources from the ocean floor, the importance of the ISA is its capacity to reconcile economic ambitions with environmental responsibility, promoting fair advantages for all countries and protecting the fragile equilibrium of our interconnected global ecosystem.

Deep-sea mining, an increasingly contentious practice, is motivated by the need for a rapid solution to the worldwide scarcity of metals. The ISA, primarily targeting mining contractors, has granted exploratory licences for polymetallic nodules to 19 firms.

These nodules, which have an appearance similar to little rocky objects, contain significant amounts of metals such as cobalt and nickel. These metals are essential components for the rapidly growing lithium battery industry.

The ecological ramifications of deep-sea mining are substantial and pervasive. Deployment of large submersible mining vehicles, such as the Patania II, has the potential to cause significant disruption and damage to the ocean floor. Activities of dredging and polymetallic nodule removal pose a significant risk of causing irreparable harm to the marine ecosystem, comparable to the destructive impact of deforestation on a rainforest.

Deep-sea ecosystems are remarkably fragile and exhibit a sluggish capacity for regeneration as a result of the severe conditions of pressure, temperature and darkness. Mining endeavours have the potential to destabilise sediment plumes, which can result in the suffocating of benthic organisms and the disruption of the intricate food chain equilibrium.

The nodules, which require more than 10 million years to develop, are a limited resource, highlighting the necessity for carefulness in their exploitation. Although the mining industry advocates for deep-sea mining as a circular economy solution, some contend that this approach neglects the environmental repercussions.

Achieving true circularity necessitates significant investment in recycling infrastructure, rather than relying solely on large-scale metal extraction. The pressing need for minerals, particularly cobalt (expected to increase by 500 percent by 2050, as stated by the World Bank), underscores the necessity for systemic alterations in consumer habits and the longevity of products.

Notwithstanding the pressing nature of the issue, there is a growing worldwide movement that is gathering strength and promoting the prohibition of deep-sea mining.

ISA, having assigned substantial areas of the Atlantic, Pacific and Indian seas, is now facing crucial decisions over the issuance of licences for industrial extraction. Demands for a distinct division between ISA and mining corporations resonate, underscoring the imperative for a global prohibition on deep-sea mining in the open seas, akin to the effective ban on whaling.

This year is significant as industrial extraction may begin if the ISA approves mining permits. The need to take action is emphasised by the irreparable consequences that deep-sea mining could have on marine biodiversity, climate regulation and the overall well-being of the planet.

Deep-sea mining, an increasingly contentious practice, is motivated by the need for a rapid solution to the worldwide scarcity of metals.

As the ISA’s involvement in the allocation of oceanic regions is examined closely, ongoing endeavours to advocate for a prohibition emphasise the significance of averting the irreversible ramifications of unregulated deep-sea mining.

In addition to the pressing environmental concerns, it is imperative to implement a more holistic systemic transformation. In order to meet the incessant demand for the most recent technological products, both product design and consumer behaviour must change.

The prevalent consumerist (disposable) culture, characterised by the frequent replacement of items instead of their repair, perpetuates the extraction of resources. The establishment of a truly circular economy necessitates substantial investments in recycling infrastructure and a comprehensive reassessment of the lifecycles of products.

Although proponents of deep-sea mining assert that it serves as a means to reduce reliance on new materials and close the cycle, this strategy’s sustainability is called into question. The extensive magnitude of polymetallic nodule extraction required to satisfy demand gives rise to apprehensions regarding inadvertent repercussions on marine ecosystems, atmospheric carbon levels, and the intricate equilibrium of life on our planet.

For example, promoting the prioritisation of repair and maintenance over the perpetual upgrading of devices among consumers could serve as a means to alleviate the environmental consequences.

In the same way, incorporating modularity or easy upgradability into the design of electronic devices can aid in the establishment of a more sustainable product lifecycle. Investing in the development of innovative recycling technologies or investigating sustainable material alternatives may present more environmentally favourable alternatives to deep-sea mining.

The capacity for an enduring and catastrophic effect on the life-support systems of our planet must not be undervalued. Deep oceans, which are frequently perceived as inaccessible and detached from terrestrial existence, serve an essential function in the processes of carbon sequestration and oxygen generation. It is not merely an environmental imperative that these ecosystems be preserved; it is also vital to the welfare of humanity.

An increasingly urgent matter that demands the attention of the international community is the implementation of a comprehensive prohibition on deep-sea mining in international waters. Attaining this objective requires coordinated endeavours to enhance consciousness, galvanise public sentiment, and interact with policymakers on a global and domestic scale.

The ecological ramifications of deep-sea mining are substantial and pervasive.

In conjunction with the critical nature of safeguarding our oceans, the triumph of previous environmental movements provides optimism that a unified front can emerge to oppose the ill-advised endeavour of deep-sea mining.

The ISA plays a crucial role in response to the changing Polar Silk Route and its impact on the growing marine operations in the Arctic. In addition to its traditional role of regulating mineral-related operations in the international seabed, the ISA is also faced with the task of addressing the issues presented by possible resource extraction and environmental consequences linked to the opening of Arctic shipping routes.

The mandate of the ISA is extended to encompass the wider repercussions of climate change, requiring the implementation of flexible legislation to guarantee sustainable practices, mitigate ecological damage, and promote fair utilisation of these fragile polar settings.

As countries increasingly explore the Arctic region for transportation and natural resources, the ISA plays a crucial role in protecting the fragile equilibrium of this developing maritime boundary.

India’s role in protecting the oceans

India has emerged as a major player in global ocean governance. Its involvement in the Arctic Council as an observer nation underscores this commitment. While primarily focused on the Arctic, India’s ocean conservation efforts extend to its coastal waters and beyond.

Domestically, the Offshore Areas Mineral (Development and Regulation) Act of 2002 provides a framework for managing mineral resources within India’s Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ). Additionally, India’s network of Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) showcases its dedication to safeguarding marine ecosystems.

India’s MPAs are designated coastal and marine regions under varying degrees of protection, case in point, the Gulf of Munnar Marine National Park and the Andaman and Nicobar Islands. These MPAs are crucial safeguards for biodiversity since they protect coastal communities, and contribute to creating sustainable fisheries by preserving critical marine habitats.

There is a growing worldwide movement that is gathering strength and promoting the prohibition of deep-sea mining.

On the international stage, India actively participates in the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) meetings, shaping global maritime regulations. The country is also a member of the International Maritime Organisation, contributing to international efforts to protect marine environments from shipping pollution. India’s growing scientific research on deep-sea ecosystems is crucial for informed decision-making.

India has been an active participant in the ISA. The country holds two exploration contracts granted by the ISA: one for polymetallic nodules in the Central Indian Ocean Basin and another for polymetallic sulphides in the Indian Ocean Ridge. These contracts highlight India’s interest in tapping into the potential mineral wealth of the seabed.

However, India’s role in the ISA extends beyond its own exploration interests. As a developing country with significant stakes in ocean resources, India can play a crucial role in shaping international regulations for deep-sea mining.

By advocating for stringent environmental safeguards and promoting equitable sharing of seabed resources, India can contribute to the sustainable management of the ocean floor.

Additionally, this would help India’s broader strategic ambitions. Given China’s increasing influence in the region and even in deep-sea mining, India stands at a critical juncture to not only counter-balance its rival but also solidify itself as a regional hegemon.

However, India faces several challenges in balancing its economic interests with environmental stewardship. It is critical to create sound legal frameworks for deep-sea mining, make sure that benefits are shared fairly, and fund research and development for sustainable alternatives.

In order to solve mutual problems and boost its bargaining power inside the ISA, India can also take advantage of its position to form alliances with other Global South nations.

By actively participating in the ISA and promoting sustainable ocean governance, India can place itself as a global leader in ocean conservation and management. However, a significant gap exists in India’s regulatory framework for deep-sea mining beyond its EEZ.

India’s approach to deep-sea mining will be crucial in shaping the future of this emerging industry. By carefully considering the potential benefits and risks, India can position itself as a responsible and innovative player in the global ocean economy.

The absence of a global leader: A critical gap in deep-sea governance

One major obstacle to successful global ocean governance is the US’s glaring exclusion from the ISA. In the past, the US has opposed the development of a legal framework for deep-sea mining, placing domestic mining interests ahead of international cooperation. The US has not yet taken the lead in this re-evaluation, despite growing global worries about the activity’s environmental effects.

This year is significant as industrial extraction may begin if the ISA approves mining permits

With its significant geopolitical and economic clout, the United States is in a unique position to affect the direction of deep-sea mining. Its involvement in the ISA would be crucial to creating strong environmental protections and guaranteeing fair resource distribution. Regrettably, the US’s prolonged absence prevents the establishment of a complete and efficient international order by leaving a leadership vacuum.

This absence of global leadership raises the possibility of uncontrolled, potentially dangerous deep-sea mining operations.

Due to the lack of a distinct global leader, other nations have been able to step in and take advantage of the opportunity, although their level of success has varied. China has become a major participant in deep-sea mining, making substantial investments in research and development.

Although there are concerns about China’s environmental record, its involvement has emphasised the necessity of robust international cooperation. In contrast, nations such as Norway, which have a well-established history of marine conservation, have adopted a more prudent strategy by prioritising the precautionary principle.

By reengaging with the ISA, the US has the potential to establish a crucial equilibrium between economic interests and environmental preservation. Participating would not only bolster the global regulatory framework but also amplify its influence in determining the future of the maritime economy.

Additionally, the leadership of the US has the potential to cultivate enhanced confidence and collaboration among nations, thereby diminishing the likelihood of geopolitical conflicts stemming from the race for seabed resources.

It is imperative for the international community to escalate its efforts in order to promote US involvement in this crucial matter. It is also important to adopt a cooperative strategy that includes all significant maritime nations in order to safeguard the fragile marine ecosystems and guarantee the sustainable administration of oceanic resources.

A call to action: Protecting our ocean’s last frontier

The prospect of deep-sea mining poses a significant threat to the future of our oceans. The potential ecological damage is tremendous, with extensive implications for marine biodiversity, climate regulation and human well-being.

India has emerged as a major player in global ocean governance. Its involvement in the Arctic Council as an observer nation underscores this commitment.

Deep-sea habitats, commonly known as the ‘rainforests of the sea’, house a wide variety of distinctive and delicate species, such as deep-sea corals, sponges and peculiar fish that have evolved in harsh environments.

These ecosystems play a crucial role in providing essential services to the environment, including storing carbon, recycling nutrients and sustaining global fisheries.

Mining in these fragile areas has the potential to do irreparable harm, resulting in widespread species loss and disturbing the delicate equilibrium of marine ecosystems.
In addition to the immediate ecological consequences, deep-sea mining presents substantial hazards to climatic stability.

The ocean plays a vital role in the regulation of the Earth’s climate through the absorption of carbon dioxide. Mining activities that disturb seafloor sediments have the potential to release stored carbon, which can worsen the effects of climate change.

In addition, deep-sea mining may disrupt the ocean’s capacity to absorb heat, which could result in heightened occurrences of severe weather events and an increase in sea levels.

It is necessary to consider the substantial environmental concerns while evaluating the potential economic advantages of deep-sea mining. Engaging in deep-sea mining without a thorough comprehension of its repercussions is a risk that we cannot financially bear, despite the worldwide need for essential minerals.

To decrease our dependence on deep-sea resources, it is crucial to allocate resources towards researching and developing alternative technologies, including enhanced recycling techniques, advancements in battery technology, and sustainable mining practices on land.

In order to protect our seas for future generations, it is imperative that we insist on prompt action from governments, international organisations and the mining sector.

In addition, deep-sea mining may disrupt the ocean’s capacity to absorb heat, which could result in heightened occurrences of severe weather events and an increase in sea levels.

It is also crucial to implement a worldwide ban on deep-sea mining until comprehensive scientific studies, assessments of environmental damage and international rules are established.

Furthermore, it is critical to endorse endeavours that advocate for the preservation of the ocean, the establishment of sustainable fishing practices, and the creation of marine protected zones.

The deep sea is an expansive and predominantly uncharted territory. Preserving this invaluable asset for future generations is our duty. Through prompt and cooperative action, we can guarantee the ocean’s ongoing ability to sustain life on our planet and serve as a perpetual wellspring of awe and motivation for future generations.

Anuraj Singh is an incoming student at the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy and has formal training in political science with a specialisation in foreign policy and economics.

Rohan Singh is a practising advocate who regularly appears before the Supreme Court of India and the Delhi High Court.